There was a little girl, maybe three or four years grown from birth, who was dressed as a princess. A Disney princess would be a more fulfilling description, but for little girls her age, and others who are not presented daily with the pomp of an established monarchial society, her pink and purple dress, and plastic tiara placed haphazardly on her head would be easily communicated as that of a princess; and the terms real or fantasy would be irrelevant. This princess played on the playground with my son and several other children for a while this afternoon.
I watched her and vainly tried to determine if she would grow up to be the type of woman who looked back at pictures of herself at this age and raged at her parents for allowing her to dress that way in public, or would she praise her parents for allowing her the freedom to pursue her own idea of creativity and live without social persecution within the structure of her imagination.
Another scene came to mind; one with a little girl aged about the same as the princess on the playground, perhaps even a year older and having already outgrown the luxury of the princess attire. This other scene is situated nearly a full year prior and is in no other way related other than the path of my thought as leading to a memory. The little girl of the past year announced to me that she “used to be a princess, but that was when [she] was little.” She spoke these words as a former President might speak of his previously elected title which has since been passed along. Without need, and more to feed my humor, I asked her age. “I’m four, but when I was a princess, I was just a baby,” she said.
That this story is about two little girls and both little girls are, or have at one time been princesses, is mostly irrelevant. The situation could have just as easily involved two little boys: one of whom dressed as Superman, the other a four year old who has outgrown the days when he was Superman. The question which arises as I connect the current scene with the scene of the little girl in my memory is: Do we ever really outgrow this stage of our lives?
It seems humorous from the perspective of an adult, or grown-up, as childhood vernacular allocates, that a little girl who has aged only four years would have already outgrown the fantasy of being a princess, or that she has outgrown the status of being a baby. Again, do we ever really outgrow this stage of our lives, or do we become more competent at hiding this level of creativity and imagination from the world around us and eventually ourselves? Are our “grown-up” selves merely disguises employed to distance ourselves from our childhood? Do we disguise ourselves so well that we begin to believe our own facade? When does the masquerade become the reality we have tried for years to suppress for the sake of becoming adults from the distanced perspective of children, and not adults as a continuation of the lives we began as children? Why must becoming a responsible adult mean sacrificing our childhood imagination and playfulness?
There is an ancient practice of disguising the firstborn male child of a family as a female to protect the child from what were perceived as demons, and oftentimes real dangers of persecution. It is a simple matter to relegate such a seemingly absurd practice to the ancients, or to suppose that it belongs solely to other cultures and not our own, but the reality is that this practice continues in varied form and is so integrated into normalcy that the practice is effectively disguised as something else, something different than what it is. This practice goes beyond the conversion of male to female, princess to former princess, or Superman to common man. The process in which we engage to disguise ourselves from ourselves, as witnessed from the perspective of childhood to that of adulthood, is really the death of our original selves.